Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make performance of TPCH q15 stable (#4570) #4710

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4570

Signed-off-by: xufei [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #4451

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Actually, there are 2 possible solutions

  • Consider local delta memory usage when estimate the result_size_bytes in aggregator on each execute of executeOnBlock
  • In Aggregator::mergeAndConvertToBlocks, check the result_size_bytes, and if it exceeds the threshold, convert all the hash table into two-level hash table

For the first solution, converting hash table to two-level hash table can be done by each threads in the first stage of ParallelAggregating, and for the second solution, this converting things are executed in 1 threads.

I've done some test for both solutions, and found first solution has ~20% perfomance gain compared to the second solution for TPCH q15. So I choose the first solution.

Why not enable two-level hash table by default for all the cases:

  • not all the agg method support two-level hash table
  • test results shows that always use two-level hash table is slower if the table data is small, and the size of agg results is small.

Testing query:
select count(*),id from test group by id;
test has 65536 rows, all rows have the same id, that is to say the above query return only 1 row
Testing cluster has only 1 TiFlash, and the cpu has 36 core, each query is running 1000 times.

currency = 1 currency = 5
two level hash table 22s 40s
normal hash table 16s 26s

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Apr 19, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • fzhedu
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Apr 19, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.3 labels Apr 19, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Jun 14, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jun 14, 2022
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 14, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@fzhedu fzhedu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jun 14, 2022
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@windtalker: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 112bc2b

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 15, 2022
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@windtalker: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 3336dc4

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 15, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jun 15, 2022

lines: 36.0% (42939 out of 119384)
branches: 5.4% (65797 out of 1221606)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit f090503 into pingcap:release-5.3 Jun 15, 2022
@heibaijian heibaijian added this to the v5.3.2 milestone Jun 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants